The differences in approaces taken by female and male leadings in Dissertation

The differences in approaces taken by female and male leadings in leading change - harangue ExampleAccording to the investigate findings there has been a increase involve manpowert of women in the workforce in recent decades and they can be seen participating actively in business and economic development. However, there salvage exists an imbalance in the male-female ratio in the workforce, and there is a substantial earnings gap in the midst of the genders. This inequality is more than app atomic number 18nt in the case of women in management. The smaller number of women in visor management is indicative of the fact that women do not get to climb the higher echelons in organizations easily. many researchers call this situation as the glass ceiling, indicating that women, who ar meritorious and capable, too may not be able to break the ceiling and enter the realm of top management because of their gender. There has been some research undertaken to assess the reason for the e xistence of a glass ceiling or the lack of women who are deemed dependant to occupy positions in upper management. Men are often considered to be more competent than women and it is presumed that men have the leadership qualities that are needed at the higher positions. Researchers have found manful organisational culture, which is hostile to the female workers, is also responsible for curbing the growth of female leaders. Men are horizon to adopt a masculine leadership style, and even women who do pass through the glass ceiling, are expected to keep away from exhibiting their feminine side (Pai and Vaidya, 2009). Ragins, Singh, and Cornwell (2007) explained that while business organizations are struggling to drop on to their best and brightest women, the persistence of the glass ceiling makes retaining top-notch female talents challenging. Dismantling the glass ceiling requires an sinless understanding of the overt and subtle barriers to advancement faced by women, and the st rategies used to overcome these barriers. Women leaders are often considered to be passive, overly relationship-oriented and emotionally unstable (Northouse, 2009). On the other hand, male leaders are often observed as aggressive, direct and task oriented - qualities which are comprehend as attributes of favorable leaders (Weyer, 2007). The available research has indicated that the general concept of leadership may be one-dimensional and perceived from a masculine point of view (Pai and Vaidya, 2009 Kargwell, 2008 Weyer, 2007 Tibus, 2010 Caykoylu, 2010 Biernat, 2003). The masculine leaders are considered to be more task-oriented and maintain their authority to discipline, correct or reward the employees on the basis of the employees performance (Spurgeon and Cross, 2008). Men are associated with this masculine style of leadership owing to their gender (Thewlis, Miller and Neathy, 2004), while women are considered to follow a more feminine approach which involves being passive and giving importance to relationships over tasks (Thomas and Thomas, 2008). There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that a more relationship oriented leadership style leads to better employee pauperism and performance in